These are exceptionally busy days for the new Police & Crime Commissioners.
No matter how experienced they were in their previous roles, I am imagine they are all on a very steep learning curve. Moreover, there will be a legion of people wanting some of their time in order to start building long term relationships of trust and mutual influence. Added to this will be the fast moving conveyor belts taking them towards producing their budgets, precept proposals and policing plans (and the conveyor belts may not be all heading in the same direction let alone towards the manifesto pledges on which they were elected).
If I were a PCC, I would imagine that I could well feel as if my time were not my own any more.
Nonetheless, I would like to ask all PCCs a question: how many conversations have you had in the last two weeks or so with ‘ordinary’ people? By ordinary I exclude anyone holding an official position as officer or member relating to your task as PCC. By ordinary Iinclude a real live victim of crime, or a person from residents’ association, or a parent of young person mixed up in crime, or a student who is afraid to walk to college etc.
How many conversations?
And how will you continue to have these conversations, if not many more of them, as you get ever deeper into the small ‘p’ politics of your job? Have you arranged a schedule of surgeries in the localities that you now look after? How are you going to find out what the ‘ordinary’ people who elected you, want, hope and need from the police services and crime agencies that you now oversee?
Courtesy of Jon Harvey at A Just Future: Fair for All
Comments
No responses to “The ordinary people test”